日韩中文字幕在线一区二区三区,亚洲热视频在线观看,久久精品午夜一区二区福利,精品一区二区三区在线观看l,麻花传媒剧电影,亚洲香蕉伊综合在人在线,免费av一区二区三区在线,亚洲成在线人视频观看
          首頁(yè) 500強(qiáng) 活動(dòng) 榜單 商業(yè) 科技 商潮 專題 品牌中心
          雜志訂閱

          2026財(cái)年前四個(gè)月,美國(guó)政府財(cái)政支出巨大

          Eleanor Pringle
          2026-02-25

          美國(guó)政府支出持續(xù)高于財(cái)政收入,債務(wù)利息支出進(jìn)一步加劇了財(cái)政壓力。

          文本設(shè)置
          小號(hào)
          默認(rèn)
          大號(hào)
          Plus(0條)

          2026年2月6日,美國(guó)總統(tǒng)唐納德·特朗普在離開華盛頓特區(qū)白宮前接受記者采訪。圖片來(lái)源:ANDREW CABALLERO-REYNOLDS / AFP - Getty Images

          美國(guó)國(guó)會(huì)預(yù)算辦公室(CBO)最新估算顯示,2026財(cái)年前四個(gè)月,美國(guó)政府財(cái)政支出巨大。

          該機(jī)構(gòu)昨日發(fā)布的報(bào)告顯示,2026財(cái)年前四個(gè)月(自10月起),美國(guó)政府持續(xù)處于財(cái)政赤字狀態(tài),累計(jì)借款6960億美元。其中僅1月份就借款940億美元,相當(dāng)于過(guò)去四個(gè)月(16周)平均每周借款435億美元。

          美國(guó)政府支出持續(xù)高于財(cái)政收入,債務(wù)利息支出進(jìn)一步加劇了財(cái)政壓力。目前美國(guó)國(guó)債總額已超過(guò)38.5萬(wàn)億美元。據(jù)圣路易斯聯(lián)邦儲(chǔ)備銀行(Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis)的數(shù)據(jù),美國(guó)國(guó)內(nèi)生產(chǎn)總值(GDP)約為31萬(wàn)億美元。

          美國(guó)財(cái)政部數(shù)據(jù)顯示,截至1月31日,利息支出累計(jì)達(dá)4270億美元。按照這一趨勢(shì)推算全年,疊加新增債務(wù)產(chǎn)生的額外利息,美國(guó)政府每年需支付1萬(wàn)億美元利息。美國(guó)在2024財(cái)年首次突破這一關(guān)口,當(dāng)年利息支出總額達(dá)1.13萬(wàn)億美元,2025財(cái)年進(jìn)一步攀升至1.22萬(wàn)億美元。

          負(fù)責(zé)任聯(lián)邦預(yù)算委員會(huì)(Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget)主席馬婭·麥吉尼亞斯(Maya MacGuineas)表示:"2026財(cái)年才過(guò)去三分之一,我們?nèi)陨钕轃o(wú)休止的借貸循環(huán)……若繼續(xù)以當(dāng)前速度借款,本財(cái)年財(cái)政赤字可能再度達(dá)到1.8萬(wàn)億美元,甚至更高。"

          "如果這些估算還不足以敲響警鐘,那么美國(guó)國(guó)債持續(xù)攀升至創(chuàng)紀(jì)錄水平,目前已接近美國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)總量……除非立法者希望債務(wù)和赤字屢創(chuàng)新高成為常態(tài),否則兩黨必須攜手解決不可持續(xù)的債務(wù)問(wèn)題。立法者拖延越久,美國(guó)民眾付出的代價(jià)越大。"

          盡管相關(guān)數(shù)據(jù)觸目驚心,委員會(huì)主席們也發(fā)出警告,但市場(chǎng)和許多經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)家對(duì)美國(guó)財(cái)政狀況仍持相對(duì)樂(lè)觀態(tài)度。若市場(chǎng)對(duì)美國(guó)政府支出感到恐慌,債券收益率會(huì)是最早發(fā)出預(yù)警的指標(biāo)之一。例如,收益率上升意味著投資者認(rèn)為借貸風(fēng)險(xiǎn)上升,因而要求更高溢價(jià);反之,收益率下降則可能表明債券發(fā)行規(guī)模超過(guò)投資者需求。

          目前這兩種情況均未出現(xiàn)。截至撰稿時(shí),30年期美國(guó)國(guó)債收益率為4.8%,雖較去年年末有所回升,但仍與2025年大部分時(shí)間的水平持平。10年期美國(guó)國(guó)債收益率走勢(shì)相似,自去年春季以來(lái)始終在4.2%附近徘徊。

          在影響力范圍內(nèi)

          盡管有理論認(rèn)為,外國(guó)投資者可能利用持有的美國(guó)國(guó)債懲罰美國(guó)對(duì)盟友愈發(fā)激進(jìn)的挑釁行為;也有警告稱,投資者可能因政策因素退出市場(chǎng)(如英國(guó)前首相利茲·特拉斯(Liz Truss)時(shí)期的情況),但許多經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)家認(rèn)為,實(shí)際局面并不會(huì)如此極端。其中一種應(yīng)對(duì)方式是“金融抑制”:強(qiáng)制要求機(jī)構(gòu)增持國(guó)債,確保買家支撐國(guó)債價(jià)值。另一種策略是放任通脹溫和上升:雖會(huì)損害消費(fèi)者利益,但能稀釋債務(wù)實(shí)際價(jià)值。量化寬松同樣是備選方案,原因是增加貨幣供應(yīng)雖可能引發(fā)通脹,但能達(dá)到降低實(shí)際借貸成本的效果。

          這可能是投資者保持信心的原因——即便債務(wù)危機(jī)真的爆發(fā),美國(guó)也足以妥善應(yīng)對(duì)。

          但若美國(guó)無(wú)法通過(guò)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)改善失衡的債務(wù)與國(guó)內(nèi)生產(chǎn)總值比率,那么后果將不堪設(shè)想。更多資金被用于維持借貸,這正是橋水基金(Bridgewater Associates)創(chuàng)始人瑞·達(dá)利歐(Ray Dalio)常抱怨的問(wèn)題。達(dá)利歐在一系列社交媒體帖子和訪談[包括與《財(cái)富》雜志黛安·布雷迪(Diane Brady)的對(duì)話]中警告稱,美國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)即將面臨“心臟病發(fā)作”的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)。

          “我們的支出比收入高出40%,這是一個(gè)長(zhǎng)期存在的問(wèn)題,”他去年在接受福克斯商業(yè)頻道采訪時(shí)說(shuō),“你們會(huì)看到債務(wù)利息支出……正不斷擠壓購(gòu)買力,就像動(dòng)脈中的斑塊一樣。”(財(cái)富中文網(wǎng))

          譯者:中慧言-王芳

          美國(guó)國(guó)會(huì)預(yù)算辦公室(CBO)最新估算顯示,2026財(cái)年前四個(gè)月,美國(guó)政府財(cái)政支出巨大。

          該機(jī)構(gòu)昨日發(fā)布的報(bào)告顯示,2026財(cái)年前四個(gè)月(自10月起),美國(guó)政府持續(xù)處于財(cái)政赤字狀態(tài),累計(jì)借款6960億美元。其中僅1月份就借款940億美元,相當(dāng)于過(guò)去四個(gè)月(16周)平均每周借款435億美元。

          美國(guó)政府支出持續(xù)高于財(cái)政收入,債務(wù)利息支出進(jìn)一步加劇了財(cái)政壓力。目前美國(guó)國(guó)債總額已超過(guò)38.5萬(wàn)億美元。據(jù)圣路易斯聯(lián)邦儲(chǔ)備銀行(Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis)的數(shù)據(jù),美國(guó)國(guó)內(nèi)生產(chǎn)總值(GDP)約為31萬(wàn)億美元。

          美國(guó)財(cái)政部數(shù)據(jù)顯示,截至1月31日,利息支出累計(jì)達(dá)4270億美元。按照這一趨勢(shì)推算全年,疊加新增債務(wù)產(chǎn)生的額外利息,美國(guó)政府每年需支付1萬(wàn)億美元利息。美國(guó)在2024財(cái)年首次突破這一關(guān)口,當(dāng)年利息支出總額達(dá)1.13萬(wàn)億美元,2025財(cái)年進(jìn)一步攀升至1.22萬(wàn)億美元。

          負(fù)責(zé)任聯(lián)邦預(yù)算委員會(huì)(Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget)主席馬婭·麥吉尼亞斯(Maya MacGuineas)表示:"2026財(cái)年才過(guò)去三分之一,我們?nèi)陨钕轃o(wú)休止的借貸循環(huán)……若繼續(xù)以當(dāng)前速度借款,本財(cái)年財(cái)政赤字可能再度達(dá)到1.8萬(wàn)億美元,甚至更高。"

          "如果這些估算還不足以敲響警鐘,那么美國(guó)國(guó)債持續(xù)攀升至創(chuàng)紀(jì)錄水平,目前已接近美國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)總量……除非立法者希望債務(wù)和赤字屢創(chuàng)新高成為常態(tài),否則兩黨必須攜手解決不可持續(xù)的債務(wù)問(wèn)題。立法者拖延越久,美國(guó)民眾付出的代價(jià)越大。"

          盡管相關(guān)數(shù)據(jù)觸目驚心,委員會(huì)主席們也發(fā)出警告,但市場(chǎng)和許多經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)家對(duì)美國(guó)財(cái)政狀況仍持相對(duì)樂(lè)觀態(tài)度。若市場(chǎng)對(duì)美國(guó)政府支出感到恐慌,債券收益率會(huì)是最早發(fā)出預(yù)警的指標(biāo)之一。例如,收益率上升意味著投資者認(rèn)為借貸風(fēng)險(xiǎn)上升,因而要求更高溢價(jià);反之,收益率下降則可能表明債券發(fā)行規(guī)模超過(guò)投資者需求。

          目前這兩種情況均未出現(xiàn)。截至撰稿時(shí),30年期美國(guó)國(guó)債收益率為4.8%,雖較去年年末有所回升,但仍與2025年大部分時(shí)間的水平持平。10年期美國(guó)國(guó)債收益率走勢(shì)相似,自去年春季以來(lái)始終在4.2%附近徘徊。

          在影響力范圍內(nèi)

          盡管有理論認(rèn)為,外國(guó)投資者可能利用持有的美國(guó)國(guó)債懲罰美國(guó)對(duì)盟友愈發(fā)激進(jìn)的挑釁行為;也有警告稱,投資者可能因政策因素退出市場(chǎng)(如英國(guó)前首相利茲·特拉斯(Liz Truss)時(shí)期的情況),但許多經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)家認(rèn)為,實(shí)際局面并不會(huì)如此極端。其中一種應(yīng)對(duì)方式是“金融抑制”:強(qiáng)制要求機(jī)構(gòu)增持國(guó)債,確保買家支撐國(guó)債價(jià)值。另一種策略是放任通脹溫和上升:雖會(huì)損害消費(fèi)者利益,但能稀釋債務(wù)實(shí)際價(jià)值。量化寬松同樣是備選方案,原因是增加貨幣供應(yīng)雖可能引發(fā)通脹,但能達(dá)到降低實(shí)際借貸成本的效果。

          這可能是投資者保持信心的原因——即便債務(wù)危機(jī)真的爆發(fā),美國(guó)也足以妥善應(yīng)對(duì)。

          但若美國(guó)無(wú)法通過(guò)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)改善失衡的債務(wù)與國(guó)內(nèi)生產(chǎn)總值比率,那么后果將不堪設(shè)想。更多資金被用于維持借貸,這正是橋水基金(Bridgewater Associates)創(chuàng)始人瑞·達(dá)利歐(Ray Dalio)常抱怨的問(wèn)題。達(dá)利歐在一系列社交媒體帖子和訪談[包括與《財(cái)富》雜志黛安·布雷迪(Diane Brady)的對(duì)話]中警告稱,美國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)即將面臨“心臟病發(fā)作”的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)。

          “我們的支出比收入高出40%,這是一個(gè)長(zhǎng)期存在的問(wèn)題,”他去年在接受福克斯商業(yè)頻道采訪時(shí)說(shuō),“你們會(huì)看到債務(wù)利息支出……正不斷擠壓購(gòu)買力,就像動(dòng)脈中的斑塊一樣。”(財(cái)富中文網(wǎng))

          譯者:中慧言-王芳

          The first four months of fiscal year 2026 got off to an expensive start for the U.S., according to the latest estimates from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) .

          The CBO released a report yesterday detailing that, for the first third of FY26 (which began in October), the U.S. government operated at a deficit, and so borrowed $696 billion. That included $94 billion in January alone, and works out to an average of $43.5 billion for each of the 16 weeks of the four months since.

          While America’s government spending outweighs its revenue generation, its finances are also negatively compounded by the interest payments needed to maintain its debt. Total national debt now sits at more than $38.5 trillion. U.S. GDP is about $31 trillion, according to the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.

          Per Treasury data, up to Jan. 31, the interest expenses paid out have totaled $427 billion. Extending that trajectory over the course of a year, and with additional debt being added, requiring additional interest payments, the U.S. government will need to pay out $1 trillion annually to service its borrowing. This benchmark was first hit in FY2024 when interest payments totaled $1.13 trillion. In FY2025 that rose to $1.22 trillion.

          “We are only a third into FY 2026, and yet we remain in the routine of endless borrowing…If we continue to borrow at this rate, it leaves us on the path to another year of a $1.8 trillion or higher deficit,” according to Maya MacGuineas, president of the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget.

          “If these estimates aren’t alarming enough, the national debt continues to climb toward record levels, equaling about the size of the entire U.S. economy today…Unless lawmakers want record-high debts and deficits to be our norm, both sides of the aisle must come together to address our unsustainable borrowing. The longer lawmakers wait, the higher the price for Americans.”

          Despite the eye-watering figures and the warnings from committee chiefs, the market and many economists are still relatively comfortable with America’s fiscal situation. If markets were to panic about Uncle Sam’s spending, bond yields would be among the earliest red flags to go up. Yields rising, for example, might be a signal that investors are demanding higher premiums because the perceived risk of the lending has increased. Contrarily, yields moving lower may be a signal that bond issuance is outpacing demand from investors.

          Neither of these has happened. At the time of writing, 30-year Treasuries sit at 4.8%—relatively elevated compared to late last year but still in line with much of 2025. Ten-year Treasuries are similar, floating around the 4.2% mark since last spring.

          Within sphere of influence

          Despite theories that foreign investors could leverage their holdings of U.S. debt to punish America for its increasing aggression toward its allies, or warnings that investors may back out of the market over policy (à la Liz Truss), many economists think the outcome will be somewhat less dramatic. “Financial repression” is one option: mandating that institutions must hold more debt, thus ensuring buyers prop up its value. Or inflation could be allowed to trickle higher: bad for consumers, but it would erode the real value of the debt. Quantitative easing could be another option, as increasing the money supply may prove inflationary but would have the desired effect of lowering the real value of borrowing.

          This is likely what gives investors confidence, because the U.S. may be relatively well-equipped to handle a debt crisis, should one occur.

          But if the country cannot grow itself out of an unhealthy debt-to-GDP balance, the outcome isn’t a palatable one. More funds would continue to be diverted to maintaining borrowing—something Bridgewater Associates founder Ray Dalio often complains about. Dalio has warned of an impending economic “heart attack” in a series of social media posts and interviews, including with Fortune’s Diane Brady.

          “We’re spending 40% more than we’re taking in, and this is a chronic problem,” he said in an appearance on Fox Business last year. “What you’re seeing is the debt service payments…well into squeezing away, so it’s like plaque in the arteries, squeezing away buying power.”

          財(cái)富中文網(wǎng)所刊載內(nèi)容之知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)為財(cái)富媒體知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)有限公司及/或相關(guān)權(quán)利人專屬所有或持有。未經(jīng)許可,禁止進(jìn)行轉(zhuǎn)載、摘編、復(fù)制及建立鏡像等任何使用。
          0條Plus
          精彩評(píng)論
          評(píng)論

          撰寫或查看更多評(píng)論

          請(qǐng)打開財(cái)富Plus APP

          前往打開