
經(jīng)過多年對(duì)不同領(lǐng)域杰出人士的研究,頂尖心理學(xué)家安杰拉·達(dá)克沃斯確定了被她稱為最可靠的成功預(yù)測因素,這對(duì)認(rèn)為天賦和智力才是成功關(guān)鍵的傳統(tǒng)觀念構(gòu)成了挑戰(zhàn)。在周一發(fā)布的播客節(jié)目錄制中,擁有460萬YouTube訂閱者的作家梅爾·羅賓斯就這項(xiàng)研究成果采訪了達(dá)克沃斯。
達(dá)克沃斯解釋說:“無論他們?nèi)〉玫氖鞘裁闯删停晒θ耸康墓餐c(diǎn)在于一種特殊的組合:對(duì)長期目標(biāo)的激情與毅力。簡而言之,就是他們的‘堅(jiān)毅’。”
作為賓夕法尼亞大學(xué)(University of Pennsylvania)教授和麥克阿瑟天才獎(jiǎng)(MacArthur Fellow)得主,達(dá)克沃斯將堅(jiān)毅定義為兩個(gè)隨時(shí)間推移而相互作用、相互關(guān)聯(lián)的組成部分。她說道:“就是這兩個(gè)部分,對(duì)吧?對(duì)長期目標(biāo)的激情,比如熱愛某事并始終保持熱愛,而不是經(jīng)常更換目標(biāo)。他們始終有一個(gè)目標(biāo),如‘北極星’般指引著他們前進(jìn)。”
達(dá)克沃斯認(rèn)為,毅力同樣至關(guān)重要。“一方面是要付出努力,對(duì)吧?一方面你需要練習(xí)尚未掌握的技能,另一方面要有韌性。所以,所謂毅力的部分含義在于:在極其糟糕的日子里,你能否重新振作起來?”
研究表明,對(duì)孩子或西點(diǎn)軍校學(xué)員而言,堅(jiān)毅是最重要的因素
達(dá)克沃斯自2007年開始的研究提出了一個(gè)觀點(diǎn):堅(jiān)毅品質(zhì)優(yōu)于傳統(tǒng)的成功預(yù)測指標(biāo)。她對(duì)美國軍事學(xué)院(U.S. Military Academy)[西點(diǎn)軍校(West Point)]超過11,000名學(xué)員進(jìn)行了多年研究,在入學(xué)時(shí)測量他們的"堅(jiān)毅得分",并追蹤他們?cè)谝詷O其艱苦著稱的“野獸營”訓(xùn)練計(jì)劃中的表現(xiàn)。
結(jié)果令人震驚:堅(jiān)毅成為預(yù)測哪些學(xué)員能完成這項(xiàng)為期六周的高強(qiáng)度訓(xùn)練的最有力指標(biāo),其預(yù)測效果超過了SAT成績、高中平均績點(diǎn)、體能測試,甚至超過了西點(diǎn)軍校的綜合“候選人總評(píng)分”。盡管通常有3%的新學(xué)員會(huì)在“野獸營”中途退出,但堅(jiān)毅得分較高的學(xué)員堅(jiān)持到底的可能性明顯更大。
軍校的傳統(tǒng)指標(biāo)未能反映出最關(guān)鍵的因素:在面對(duì)極端挑戰(zhàn)時(shí)堅(jiān)持下去的能力。
達(dá)克沃斯對(duì)全美拼字比賽(National Spelling Bee)選手的研究中也發(fā)現(xiàn)了類似規(guī)律。堅(jiān)毅得分較高的孩子更有可能進(jìn)入比賽后期階段,這與其智力水平無關(guān)。研究顯示,這些“堅(jiān)毅型”選手更頻繁地進(jìn)行研究人員所說的“刻意練習(xí)”:即獨(dú)自進(jìn)行艱苦、往往不愉快的單詞背誦與學(xué)習(xí),而不是選擇更輕松的方式,比如由他人出題測驗(yàn)。
努力的方程式
達(dá)克沃斯的研究揭示了堅(jiān)毅與傳統(tǒng)能力指標(biāo)之間一種出人意料的關(guān)系。她在播客中對(duì)羅賓斯表示:“我認(rèn)為,任何心理學(xué)家告訴你值得擁有的品質(zhì),在某種程度上都是可控的。我并不是說基因不會(huì)發(fā)揮作用,因?yàn)槊课恍睦韺W(xué)家都會(huì)告訴你,基因在任何事情中都扮演一定角色——堅(jiān)毅也不例外。但你知道,我們有多堅(jiān)毅,很大程度上取決于我們的知識(shí)、所處的圈子和所處的環(huán)境。”
在一項(xiàng)研究中,達(dá)克沃斯發(fā)現(xiàn)智力較高的學(xué)生實(shí)際上比智力測試得分較低的同齡人更缺乏堅(jiān)毅這種品質(zhì)。這一發(fā)現(xiàn)表明,那些并非天賦異稟的人往往能通過更加努力和更堅(jiān)定的決心來彌補(bǔ)這一差距,而他們的努力最終會(huì)獲得回報(bào)。在一所常春藤盟校,取得最高平均績點(diǎn)的是最堅(jiān)毅的學(xué)生,而非最聰明的學(xué)生。
達(dá)克沃斯認(rèn)為,在成就的方程式中,“努力會(huì)出現(xiàn)兩次”。她的公式如下:天賦 × 努力 = 技能,技能 × 努力 = 成就。
她在2017年接受《福布斯》雜志采訪時(shí)表示:“天賦是指當(dāng)你投入努力時(shí)技能提升的速度。成就是指當(dāng)你運(yùn)用所掌握的技能時(shí)所取得的結(jié)果。”
重要提醒:堅(jiān)毅并非萬能
達(dá)克沃斯的研究對(duì)教育政策討論和軍事訓(xùn)練項(xiàng)目產(chǎn)生了影響,盡管她對(duì)這一特質(zhì)所起作用的看法已有所改變。2018年,她在接受EdSurge采訪時(shí)承認(rèn):“當(dāng)我們談?wù)摵⒆觽兂砷L為幸福、健康、并能造福他人的成年人所需的品質(zhì)時(shí),這個(gè)清單很長。堅(jiān)毅是其中一種品質(zhì),但并非唯一的品質(zhì)。”
近期的研究既支持又完善了達(dá)克沃斯的發(fā)現(xiàn)。2019年一項(xiàng)關(guān)于西點(diǎn)軍校學(xué)員的研究(達(dá)克沃斯亦為合著者)發(fā)現(xiàn),盡管堅(jiān)毅仍是畢業(yè)的重要預(yù)測指標(biāo),但認(rèn)知能力才是預(yù)測學(xué)業(yè)和軍事表現(xiàn)的最強(qiáng)指標(biāo)。其他研究則質(zhì)疑,堅(jiān)毅是否在既有的人格特質(zhì)(如責(zé)任心)之外,能帶來顯著的預(yù)測作用。
盡管學(xué)術(shù)界對(duì)堅(jiān)毅作為獨(dú)立概念的獨(dú)特性仍有爭論,但核心見解依然具有吸引力:持續(xù)的努力與對(duì)長期目標(biāo)的投入,往往比天賦本身更為重要。正如達(dá)克沃斯在2017年所說的那樣:“我們的潛力是一回事,如何運(yùn)用它則是另一回事。”(財(cái)富中文網(wǎng))
譯者:劉進(jìn)龍
審校:汪皓
經(jīng)過多年對(duì)不同領(lǐng)域杰出人士的研究,頂尖心理學(xué)家安杰拉·達(dá)克沃斯確定了被她稱為最可靠的成功預(yù)測因素,這對(duì)認(rèn)為天賦和智力才是成功關(guān)鍵的傳統(tǒng)觀念構(gòu)成了挑戰(zhàn)。在周一發(fā)布的播客節(jié)目錄制中,擁有460萬YouTube訂閱者的作家梅爾·羅賓斯就這項(xiàng)研究成果采訪了達(dá)克沃斯。
達(dá)克沃斯解釋說:“無論他們?nèi)〉玫氖鞘裁闯删停晒θ耸康墓餐c(diǎn)在于一種特殊的組合:對(duì)長期目標(biāo)的激情與毅力。簡而言之,就是他們的‘堅(jiān)毅’。”
作為賓夕法尼亞大學(xué)(University of Pennsylvania)教授和麥克阿瑟天才獎(jiǎng)(MacArthur Fellow)得主,達(dá)克沃斯將堅(jiān)毅定義為兩個(gè)隨時(shí)間推移而相互作用、相互關(guān)聯(lián)的組成部分。她說道:“就是這兩個(gè)部分,對(duì)吧?對(duì)長期目標(biāo)的激情,比如熱愛某事并始終保持熱愛,而不是經(jīng)常更換目標(biāo)。他們始終有一個(gè)目標(biāo),如‘北極星’般指引著他們前進(jìn)。”
達(dá)克沃斯認(rèn)為,毅力同樣至關(guān)重要。“一方面是要付出努力,對(duì)吧?一方面你需要練習(xí)尚未掌握的技能,另一方面要有韌性。所以,所謂毅力的部分含義在于:在極其糟糕的日子里,你能否重新振作起來?”
研究表明,對(duì)孩子或西點(diǎn)軍校學(xué)員而言,堅(jiān)毅是最重要的因素
達(dá)克沃斯自2007年開始的研究提出了一個(gè)觀點(diǎn):堅(jiān)毅品質(zhì)優(yōu)于傳統(tǒng)的成功預(yù)測指標(biāo)。她對(duì)美國軍事學(xué)院(U.S. Military Academy)[西點(diǎn)軍校(West Point)]超過11,000名學(xué)員進(jìn)行了多年研究,在入學(xué)時(shí)測量他們的"堅(jiān)毅得分",并追蹤他們?cè)谝詷O其艱苦著稱的“野獸營”訓(xùn)練計(jì)劃中的表現(xiàn)。
結(jié)果令人震驚:堅(jiān)毅成為預(yù)測哪些學(xué)員能完成這項(xiàng)為期六周的高強(qiáng)度訓(xùn)練的最有力指標(biāo),其預(yù)測效果超過了SAT成績、高中平均績點(diǎn)、體能測試,甚至超過了西點(diǎn)軍校的綜合“候選人總評(píng)分”。盡管通常有3%的新學(xué)員會(huì)在“野獸營”中途退出,但堅(jiān)毅得分較高的學(xué)員堅(jiān)持到底的可能性明顯更大。
軍校的傳統(tǒng)指標(biāo)未能反映出最關(guān)鍵的因素:在面對(duì)極端挑戰(zhàn)時(shí)堅(jiān)持下去的能力。
達(dá)克沃斯對(duì)全美拼字比賽(National Spelling Bee)選手的研究中也發(fā)現(xiàn)了類似規(guī)律。堅(jiān)毅得分較高的孩子更有可能進(jìn)入比賽后期階段,這與其智力水平無關(guān)。研究顯示,這些“堅(jiān)毅型”選手更頻繁地進(jìn)行研究人員所說的“刻意練習(xí)”:即獨(dú)自進(jìn)行艱苦、往往不愉快的單詞背誦與學(xué)習(xí),而不是選擇更輕松的方式,比如由他人出題測驗(yàn)。
努力的方程式
達(dá)克沃斯的研究揭示了堅(jiān)毅與傳統(tǒng)能力指標(biāo)之間一種出人意料的關(guān)系。她在播客中對(duì)羅賓斯表示:“我認(rèn)為,任何心理學(xué)家告訴你值得擁有的品質(zhì),在某種程度上都是可控的。我并不是說基因不會(huì)發(fā)揮作用,因?yàn)槊课恍睦韺W(xué)家都會(huì)告訴你,基因在任何事情中都扮演一定角色——堅(jiān)毅也不例外。但你知道,我們有多堅(jiān)毅,很大程度上取決于我們的知識(shí)、所處的圈子和所處的環(huán)境。”
在一項(xiàng)研究中,達(dá)克沃斯發(fā)現(xiàn)智力較高的學(xué)生實(shí)際上比智力測試得分較低的同齡人更缺乏堅(jiān)毅這種品質(zhì)。這一發(fā)現(xiàn)表明,那些并非天賦異稟的人往往能通過更加努力和更堅(jiān)定的決心來彌補(bǔ)這一差距,而他們的努力最終會(huì)獲得回報(bào)。在一所常春藤盟校,取得最高平均績點(diǎn)的是最堅(jiān)毅的學(xué)生,而非最聰明的學(xué)生。
達(dá)克沃斯認(rèn)為,在成就的方程式中,“努力會(huì)出現(xiàn)兩次”。她的公式如下:天賦 × 努力 = 技能,技能 × 努力 = 成就。
她在2017年接受《福布斯》雜志采訪時(shí)表示:“天賦是指當(dāng)你投入努力時(shí)技能提升的速度。成就是指當(dāng)你運(yùn)用所掌握的技能時(shí)所取得的結(jié)果。”
重要提醒:堅(jiān)毅并非萬能
達(dá)克沃斯的研究對(duì)教育政策討論和軍事訓(xùn)練項(xiàng)目產(chǎn)生了影響,盡管她對(duì)這一特質(zhì)所起作用的看法已有所改變。2018年,她在接受EdSurge采訪時(shí)承認(rèn):“當(dāng)我們談?wù)摵⒆觽兂砷L為幸福、健康、并能造福他人的成年人所需的品質(zhì)時(shí),這個(gè)清單很長。堅(jiān)毅是其中一種品質(zhì),但并非唯一的品質(zhì)。”
近期的研究既支持又完善了達(dá)克沃斯的發(fā)現(xiàn)。2019年一項(xiàng)關(guān)于西點(diǎn)軍校學(xué)員的研究(達(dá)克沃斯亦為合著者)發(fā)現(xiàn),盡管堅(jiān)毅仍是畢業(yè)的重要預(yù)測指標(biāo),但認(rèn)知能力才是預(yù)測學(xué)業(yè)和軍事表現(xiàn)的最強(qiáng)指標(biāo)。其他研究則質(zhì)疑,堅(jiān)毅是否在既有的人格特質(zhì)(如責(zé)任心)之外,能帶來顯著的預(yù)測作用。
盡管學(xué)術(shù)界對(duì)堅(jiān)毅作為獨(dú)立概念的獨(dú)特性仍有爭論,但核心見解依然具有吸引力:持續(xù)的努力與對(duì)長期目標(biāo)的投入,往往比天賦本身更為重要。正如達(dá)克沃斯在2017年所說的那樣:“我們的潛力是一回事,如何運(yùn)用它則是另一回事。”(財(cái)富中文網(wǎng))
譯者:劉進(jìn)龍
審校:汪皓
After years of studying high achievers across diverse fields, top psychologist Angela Duckworth has identified what she calls the most reliable predictor of success—and it challenges conventional wisdom about talent and intelligence. Author Mel Robbins, who has 4.6 million subscribers on YouTube, recently asked Duckworth about her findings during a recording of her podcast, released Monday.
“The common denominator of high achievers, no matter what they’re achieving, is this special combination of passion and perseverance for really long-term goals,” Duckworth explains. “And in a word, it’s grit.”
Duckworth, a professor at the University of Pennsylvania and MacArthur Fellow, defines grit as two interconnected components that work together over time. “It’s these two parts, right? Passion for long-term goals, like loving something and staying in love with it. Not kind of wandering off and doing something else, and then something else again, and then something else again, but having a kind of North Star,” she said.
The perseverance component is equally crucial, according to Duckworth. “Partly, it’s hard work, right? Partly it’s practicing what you can’t yet do, and partly it’s resilience. So part of perseverance is, on the really bad days, do you get up again?”
In children or West Point cadets, research shows grit matters most
Duckworth’s research, which dates back to 2007, has pushed the idea that grit outperforms traditional predictors of success. She studied over 11,000 cadets across multiple years at the U.S. Military Academy at West Point, measuring their “grit scores” upon entry and tracking their performance through the notoriously difficult “Beast Barracks” training program.
The results were striking: Grit proved to be the strongest predictor of which cadets would complete the grueling six-week program, outperforming SAT scores, high school GPA, physical fitness assessments, and even West Point’s comprehensive “Whole Candidate Score.” While 3% of new cadets typically leave during Beast Barracks, those with higher grit scores were significantly more likely to persist.
The academy’s traditional metrics failed to capture what mattered most: the ability to persist when facing extreme challenges.
Similar patterns emerged in Duckworth’s study of National Spelling Bee contestants. Children with higher grit scores were more likely to advance to later rounds of competition, regardless of their measured intelligence. The research showed that gritty spellers engaged more frequently in what researchers call “deliberate practice”: the effortful, often unenjoyable work of studying and memorizing words alone, rather than more pleasant activities like being quizzed by others.
The effort equation
Duckworth’s research revealed a counterintuitive relationship between grit and traditional measures of ability. “I think that absolutely anything that any psychologist tells you is a good thing to have is partly under control,” she told Robbins during the podcast. “I am not saying there aren’t genes that are at play, because every psychologist will tell you that that’s also part of the story for everything—grit included. But you know, how gritty we are is very much a function of what we know, who we’re around, and the places we go.”
In one study, Duckworth found smarter students actually had less grit than their peers who scored lower on intelligence tests. This finding suggests that individuals who aren’t naturally gifted often compensate by working harder and with greater determination—and their effort pays off. At an Ivy League university, the grittiest students, not the smartest ones, achieved the highest GPAs.
Duckworth believes “effort counts twice” in the achievement equation. Her formula is as follows: Talent × Effort = Skill, and Skill × Effort = Achievement.
“Talent is how quickly your skills improve when you invest effort. Achievement is what happens when you take your acquired skills and use them,” she told Forbes in 2017.
An important caveat: Grit isn’t everything
Duckworth’s work has influenced educational policy discussions and military training programs, though she has evolved her thinking about the trait’s role. In 2018, she acknowledged during an interview with EdSurge that “when we are talking about what kids need to grow up and live lives that are happy and healthy and good for other people, it’s a long list of things. Grit is on that list, but it is not the only thing on the list.”
Recent studies have both supported and refined Duckworth’s findings. A 2019 study of West Point cadets, which Duckworth also contributed to, found that while grit remained a significant predictor of graduation, cognitive ability was the strongest predictor of academic and military performance. Other research has questioned whether grit adds substantial predictive power beyond established personality traits like conscientiousness.
Despite ongoing scholarly debate about grit’s uniqueness as a construct, the core insight remains compelling: Sustained effort and commitment to long-term goals often matter more than natural ability alone. As Duckworth put it back in 2017, “Our potential is one thing. What we do with it is quite another.”