今日科技速遞：亞馬遜入侵iPhone

????業內人士炮轟Facebook圖表搜索功能 科技寫手史蒂夫的博客

????事實上，用戶對興趣和場所的社交互動與查詢意圖之間的聯系要比Facebook宣稱的小得多。

????計算機體系結構中，過時的數據內容被稱為是“骯臟的”。訪問骯臟數據浪費時間，而且弊大于利。在這種情況下，組成圖表搜索的大部分結構化數據正是完全不相干、而且骯臟的數據。

????事實證明，Facebook中包含的對象和興趣之間的聯系有一半是骯臟的，即“贊”與對象之間沒有真正的聯系，或者說這種聯系已經過時。這些數據是否真正代表用戶意圖根本無關緊要，重要的是，用戶對自己“贊”的東西根本不感冒。（財富中文網）

????譯者：項航

????Facebook Graph Search's dirty promise and the con of the Facebook "Like" [STEVE'S BLOG]

????The truth however is that the link between query intent and your social interactions for interests and places is much weaker than FB wants you to believe.

????In computer architecture they call an out of date piece of data "dirty". Accessing dirty data is bad, wasting time and causing more harm than good. And in this context, much of the structured data that makes up Graph Search is just that:totally irrelevant and dirty.

????It turns out as much as half of the links between objects and interests contained in FB are dirty—i.e. there is no true affinity between the like and the object or it's stale. Never mind does the data not really represent user intent... but the user did not even 'like' what she was liking.